657 vs. 657x engine comparison - Page 4
pxctoday

» Log in

User Name:

Password:

Not a member yet?
Register Now!

» Find OEM Parts

» Jobs

» wallpapers

Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst ... 234
Results 31 to 33 of 33
  1. #31
    PWCToday.com Is My Home Away From Home kcr357's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    The flakka capitol of Florida
    Age
    40
    Posts
    4,157

    Re: 657 vs. 657x engine comparison

    I wouldnt bet the house on it...m
    How many gerbils could a gerbil jammer jam if a gerbil jammer could jam gerbils?


    "You build cheater motor's & still get smoked !!!!"
    "Its not your fault. You just don't understand what you're talking about. "

  2. #32
    Resident Guru hafweigthr's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    South Carolina
    Age
    58
    Posts
    1,032

    Re: 657 vs. 657x engine comparison

    This is a great thread and is invaluable to anyone working with 657 or 657X motors and trying to put together. Myself can you fix this?
    The thought that leads to no action is not thought - It is dreaming!!
    Think Big!!

    Some people have hobbies - some people have addictions - I have jet skis!!

  3. #33
    PWCToday Regular
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Location
    jacksonville, fl
    Posts
    145

    Re: 657 vs. 657x engine comparison

    The 657X has a cylinder with casting number 6913382 it is .035in taller than the 6913380-cylinder used in the 657

Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst ... 234

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.0