pxctoday

Welcome to the PWCToday forums, the world's largest PWC forum. Sea-Doo forums, Yamaha forums, Kawasaki forums, Polaris forums, Honda forums, Hydrospace forums, jet-boats forums are all included in this jetski message board, provided by SBT! This jet-ski message board is intended to provide everyone with a courteous, friendly place to find answers, meet new people, improve your riding skills and your ride!

You are currently viewing our sea-doo forums / Yamaha forums / Kawasaki forums / Polaris forums / Honda forums / hydrospace forums as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions, articles and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload your own photos and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact support.

Go Back   PWCToday > Competition & Events > Racing - General

Racing - General Anything not fitting in the other PWC, seadoo, jetski, waverunner Racing catagories in this forum section.

Find OEM Parts
wallpapers
Online Users: 365
138 members and 227 guests
Most users ever online was 2,610, 05-30-2008 at 12:18 AM.
View Poll Results: Two classes for Pro Freestyle?
Yes, 800 and Open 20 52.63%
No 18 47.37%
Voters: 38. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-26-2005, 11:46 AM   #1
Rob
PWCToday.com Is My Home Away From Home
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Dublin, PA
Age: 39
Posts: 4,396
Should Pro freestyle have a 2nd class?

Do we need to enact a second class in Pro Freestyle for 2006? The first class would be '800 Pro Freestyle', and the second would be 'Open Pro Freestyle'.

This would enable these guys to run a second boat for Open w/o limits on engine size therefore bringing the power up and the holy-**** factor to a new level.

It would also enable amateurs coming in to Pro a level playing field in the 800 class.

Thoughts?
Rob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-26-2005, 01:05 PM   #2
resident guru
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Thornton, CO
Posts: 1,129
I voted no.

I think a second class would really hurt freestyle. There are not that many Pro Caliber freestylers competing as it is, and creating a second class would create more problems then it would solve. The "Big-Air" class would have 3 maybe 4 guys in it (Malone, Lenzi, Fuji, ???) and the "Technical" class would have everyone else. I don't know about anyone else, but I want to see Stoyer, Parrdaddy, Rok, Stone, etc. compete in the same arena as the other guys. Every one of them brings a unique style to the plate and not having all of them compete against each other would just be wrong.

I think the solution needs to be A LOT simpler, give the competitors more time.

Here’s two ideas:

The first and most simple solution is to just give the competitors more then 2 minutes to do a routine and penalize anyone who excessively repeats the same trick. This would allow more tricks to be performed and increase the variety a bunch. Just imagine what Malone, Lenzi, Fuji, Stoyer, Parrdaddy, etc. could do with 5 minutes.

Now, if your thinking that sitting there having to watch 10 or so 5 minute routines would be too long and get boring, then here’s another idea. Have two "Motos" for Pro Freestyle. The first being a more traditional Freestyle routine with the standard 2 minute limit and then a Big-Air type routine with a 2-3 minute limit. Each routine would be scored separately and then the scores would be added together to decide the winner. For example, at the World Finals, the "traditional routine" would be on Saturday and the "big-air" routine would be on Sunday. At a National/Regional event, one routine would be in the morning, the other in the afternoon.

I also think it’s time to add at least another minute to the Amateur Freestyle time limit. Even without the backflips, etc., 2 minutes is not enough time to incorporate a wide variety of technical and big-air tricks.
__________________
Glen
Glory_Freestyle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-26-2005, 01:15 PM   #3
resident guru
 
parrdaddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Seabrook, TX
Age: 7
Posts: 828
I like Glory's ideas, but remember that some people have a hard time filling up 2 minutes with anything other than barrel rolls of no variation as it is I also like the idea of penalizing for repetition

For instance, if you can start your routine with a no hander lander, then why do we need to see you do a normal BR, and then a 1 hander, etc
__________________
JP

I need a job riding all day like JOE KENNEY!!!
parrdaddy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-26-2005, 01:26 PM   #4
resident guru
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Thornton, CO
Posts: 1,129
Quote:
Originally Posted by parrdaddy
I like Glory's ideas, but remember that some people have a hard time filling up 2 minutes with anything other than barrel rolls of no variation as it is I also like the idea of penalizing for repetition

For instance, if you can start your routine with a no hander lander, then why do we need to see you do a normal BR, and then a 1 hander, etc
That's why I added the penalty for excessive repetition. Even though the "old days" were almost completely flatwater routines, it was exciting as hell to see Ripper, Watkins, Kantz and Roy go out and rattle off 20 plus tricks. Even in Amateurs, if you couldn't do 18-20 different tricks, you didn't score good at all.
__________________
Glen
Glory_Freestyle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2005, 03:29 AM   #5
PWCToday.com Is My Home Away From Home
 
Waxhead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: gold coast
Age: 43
Posts: 6,999
I thought we had pro and amatuer
__________________
Mr Ski its been over 48mths now. Have those parts turned up yet. I would like my factory half pipe and the pjs reed stuffers back
Waxhead is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-25-2005, 04:06 PM   #6
Top Dog
 
Highroller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Rochester, New York
Posts: 1,571
Re: Should Pro freestyle have a 2nd class?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Glory_Freestyle
Now, if your thinking that sitting there having to watch 10 or so 5 minute routines would be too long and get boring, then here’s another idea. Have two "Motos" for Pro Freestyle. The first being a more traditional Freestyle routine with the standard 2 minute limit and then a Big-Air type routine with a 2-3 minute limit. Each routine would be scored separately and then the scores would be added together to decide the winner. For example, at the World Finals, the "traditional routine" would be on Saturday and the "big-air" routine would be on Sunday. At a National/Regional event, one routine would be in the morning, the other in the afternoon.

It's a good idea but how do you make them stay traditional? I think they will just do backflips in the traditional class so that they get everyone to go WOW and then they win. I don't think that will work. I say keep it the same. We hardly had any pros show up this year anyways. I say two passes with the wake boats! I dunno it's really hard to say.... There isn't enough pro's to break it up like that IMO but on the other hand it is very hard to compete at Malone and Lenzi's level without a huge motor and big $$$$. So maybe they should break it up. Hell... I don't know Ha ha Dan
Highroller is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-26-2005, 01:29 AM   #7
I dream skis
 
jetPilot1o1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Denver, CO
Age: 27
Posts: 496
Re: Should Pro freestyle have a 2nd class?

Ah no-Its FREESTYLE!!!!!! What about the guy on the couch? Anything goes I say-lets not make things more complicated!!!!!!!!!
__________________
Novice Ski Limited
Am Ski Open
Spec Sport
#33

2004 limited SX-R
1996 limited Super Jet
1993 spec Blaster
jetPilot1o1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-26-2005, 10:38 AM   #8
PWCToday.com Is My Home Away From Home
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: In a van, down by the river
Age: 26
Posts: 2,775
Re: Should Pro freestyle have a 2nd class?

that was just rediculous, but then again, so were many other things.
I think they need to ditch all FS rules. If you can build it, wether you're am or pro, do it. its stupid that you cant have an a/m hull in amateur freestyle.
__________________
Yadda Yadda
unclehulka13 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-26-2005, 09:55 PM   #9
I dream skis
 
FreestyleRiverRat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Louisville, Ky
Age: 31
Posts: 668
Re: Should Pro freestyle have a 2nd class?

I vote no b/c there need to be more people involved first. Perhaps when the sport gains a little more momentum there should be a divide to keep the everyday Joe competative, lets face it we can't all afford to buy lightweight hulls and 150+ hp motors. I think there should eventually be a line drawn somewhere to make the sport more appealing and competative. Perhaps even make a Novice, Amateur and Pro Freestyle class. That way a guy with foot wells on a stock boat getting in the sport cane compete in the novice class for the first time.......does some mods and increses his skills and then competes in the amature class......honestly if I think if you are running a pro level boat you should be in the pro class.
FreestyleRiverRat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-26-2005, 09:58 PM   #10
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: not at X-EGO
Posts: 4,266
Re: Should Pro freestyle have a 2nd class?

if a "pro" cant backflip and keep up with the other pros, he should go back to am freestyle. THATS their second class.
sflsurfrider is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


 
 
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:38 PM.

Copyright 2008 PWC Today. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.1
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0
All Material Copyright 2009 Watercraft Superstore