| Find OEM Parts | | | wallpapers | | | Online Users: 365 | | 138 members and 227 guests | | Most users ever online was 2,610, 05-30-2008 at 12:18 AM. | | |
View Poll Results: Two classes for Pro Freestyle? | |
Yes, 800 and Open
|    | 20 | 52.63% | |
No
|    | 18 | 47.37% |  | |
10-26-2005, 11:46 AM
|
#1 | | PWCToday.com Is My Home Away From Home
Join Date: Nov 2001 Location: Dublin, PA Age: 39
Posts: 4,396
| Should Pro freestyle have a 2nd class? Do we need to enact a second class in Pro Freestyle for 2006? The first class would be '800 Pro Freestyle', and the second would be 'Open Pro Freestyle'.
This would enable these guys to run a second boat for Open w/o limits on engine size therefore bringing the power up and the holy-**** factor to a new level.
It would also enable amateurs coming in to Pro a level playing field in the 800 class.
Thoughts? |
| |
10-26-2005, 01:05 PM
|
#2 | | resident guru
Join Date: Jan 2003 Location: Thornton, CO
Posts: 1,129
| I voted no.
I think a second class would really hurt freestyle. There are not that many Pro Caliber freestylers competing as it is, and creating a second class would create more problems then it would solve. The "Big-Air" class would have 3 maybe 4 guys in it (Malone, Lenzi, Fuji, ???) and the "Technical" class would have everyone else. I don't know about anyone else, but I want to see Stoyer, Parrdaddy, Rok, Stone, etc. compete in the same arena as the other guys. Every one of them brings a unique style to the plate and not having all of them compete against each other would just be wrong.
I think the solution needs to be A LOT simpler, give the competitors more time.
Here’s two ideas:
The first and most simple solution is to just give the competitors more then 2 minutes to do a routine and penalize anyone who excessively repeats the same trick. This would allow more tricks to be performed and increase the variety a bunch. Just imagine what Malone, Lenzi, Fuji, Stoyer, Parrdaddy, etc. could do with 5 minutes.
Now, if your thinking that sitting there having to watch 10 or so 5 minute routines would be too long and get boring, then here’s another idea. Have two "Motos" for Pro Freestyle. The first being a more traditional Freestyle routine with the standard 2 minute limit and then a Big-Air type routine with a 2-3 minute limit. Each routine would be scored separately and then the scores would be added together to decide the winner. For example, at the World Finals, the "traditional routine" would be on Saturday and the "big-air" routine would be on Sunday. At a National/Regional event, one routine would be in the morning, the other in the afternoon.
I also think it’s time to add at least another minute to the Amateur Freestyle time limit. Even without the backflips, etc., 2 minutes is not enough time to incorporate a wide variety of technical and big-air tricks.
__________________ Glen |
| |
10-26-2005, 01:15 PM
|
#3 | | resident guru
Join Date: Nov 2001 Location: Seabrook, TX Age: 7
Posts: 828
| I like Glory's ideas, but remember that some people have a hard time filling up 2 minutes with anything other than barrel rolls of no variation as it is  I also like the idea of penalizing for repetition
For instance, if you can start your routine with a no hander lander, then why do we need to see you do a normal BR, and then a 1 hander, etc
__________________ JP
I need a job riding all day like JOE KENNEY!!! |
| |
10-26-2005, 01:26 PM
|
#4 | | resident guru
Join Date: Jan 2003 Location: Thornton, CO
Posts: 1,129
| Quote: |
Originally Posted by parrdaddy I like Glory's ideas, but remember that some people have a hard time filling up 2 minutes with anything other than barrel rolls of no variation as it is  I also like the idea of penalizing for repetition
For instance, if you can start your routine with a no hander lander, then why do we need to see you do a normal BR, and then a 1 hander, etc  | That's why I added the penalty for excessive repetition. Even though the "old days" were almost completely flatwater routines, it was exciting as hell to see Ripper, Watkins, Kantz and Roy go out and rattle off 20 plus tricks. Even in Amateurs, if you couldn't do 18-20 different tricks, you didn't score good at all.
__________________ Glen |
| |
10-27-2005, 03:29 AM
|
#5 | | PWCToday.com Is My Home Away From Home
Join Date: Sep 2002 Location: gold coast Age: 43
Posts: 6,999
| I thought we had pro and amatuer
__________________ Mr Ski its been over 48mths now. Have those parts turned up yet. I would like my factory half pipe and the pjs reed stuffers back |
| |
12-25-2005, 04:06 PM
|
#6 | | Top Dog
Join Date: Feb 2002 Location: Rochester, New York
Posts: 1,571
| Re: Should Pro freestyle have a 2nd class? Quote: |
Originally Posted by Glory_Freestyle Now, if your thinking that sitting there having to watch 10 or so 5 minute routines would be too long and get boring, then here’s another idea. Have two "Motos" for Pro Freestyle. The first being a more traditional Freestyle routine with the standard 2 minute limit and then a Big-Air type routine with a 2-3 minute limit. Each routine would be scored separately and then the scores would be added together to decide the winner. For example, at the World Finals, the "traditional routine" would be on Saturday and the "big-air" routine would be on Sunday. At a National/Regional event, one routine would be in the morning, the other in the afternoon.
|
It's a good idea but how do you make them stay traditional? I think they will just do backflips in the traditional class so that they get everyone to go WOW and then they win. I don't think that will work. I say keep it the same. We hardly had any pros show up this year anyways. I say two passes with the wake boats! I dunno it's really hard to say.... There isn't enough pro's to break it up like that IMO but on the other hand it is very hard to compete at Malone and Lenzi's level without a huge motor and big $$$$. So maybe they should break it up. Hell... I don't know Ha ha Dan |
| |
12-26-2005, 01:29 AM
|
#7 | | I dream skis
Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Denver, CO Age: 27
Posts: 496
| Re: Should Pro freestyle have a 2nd class? Ah no-Its FREESTYLE!!!!!! What about the guy on the couch? Anything goes I say-lets not make things more complicated!!!!!!!!!
__________________ Novice Ski Limited
Am Ski Open
Spec Sport
#33
2004 limited SX-R
1996 limited Super Jet
1993 spec Blaster |
| |
12-26-2005, 10:38 AM
|
#8 | | PWCToday.com Is My Home Away From Home
Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: In a van, down by the river Age: 26
Posts: 2,775
| Re: Should Pro freestyle have a 2nd class? that was just rediculous, but then again, so were many other things.
I think they need to ditch all FS rules. If you can build it, wether you're am or pro, do it. its stupid that you cant have an a/m hull in amateur freestyle.
__________________ Yadda Yadda |
| |
12-26-2005, 09:55 PM
|
#9 | | I dream skis
Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: Louisville, Ky Age: 31
Posts: 668
| Re: Should Pro freestyle have a 2nd class? I vote no b/c there need to be more people involved first. Perhaps when the sport gains a little more momentum there should be a divide to keep the everyday Joe competative, lets face it we can't all afford to buy lightweight hulls and 150+ hp motors. I think there should eventually be a line drawn somewhere to make the sport more appealing and competative. Perhaps even make a Novice, Amateur and Pro Freestyle class. That way a guy with foot wells on a stock boat getting in the sport cane compete in the novice class for the first time.......does some mods and increses his skills and then competes in the amature class......honestly if I think if you are running a pro level boat you should be in the pro class. |
| |
12-26-2005, 09:58 PM
|
#10 | | Banned
Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: not at X-EGO
Posts: 4,266
| Re: Should Pro freestyle have a 2nd class? if a "pro" cant backflip and keep up with the other pros, he should go back to am freestyle. THATS their second class. |
| |  | | |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | |