pxctoday

Welcome to the PWCToday forums, the world's largest PWC forum. Sea-Doo forums, Yamaha forums, Kawasaki forums, Polaris forums, Honda forums, Hydrospace forums, jet-boats forums are all included in this jetski message board, provided by SBT! This jet-ski message board is intended to provide everyone with a courteous, friendly place to find answers, meet new people, improve your riding skills and your ride!

You are currently viewing our sea-doo forums / Yamaha forums / Kawasaki forums / Polaris forums / Honda forums / hydrospace forums as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions, articles and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload your own photos and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact support.

Go Back   PWCToday > PWC Industry Leaders > Harry Klemm - GroupK

Harry Klemm - GroupK PWC advice, by Harry Klemm, Owner of GroupK, a professional aftermarket high performance Jetski shop

Find OEM Parts
wallpapers
Online Users: 303
78 members and 225 guests
Most users ever online was 2,610, 05-30-2008 at 12:18 AM.
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-30-2009, 05:07 PM   #1
Top Dog
 
Midlake Crisis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Bakersfield, California
Age: 45
Posts: 1,284
Port matching 61x cylinders

Mr. Klemm, you posted this a long time ago on another thread:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Group K
The 61X cylinder comes with slightly milder exhaust port timings, and offers the option to run less "finished" exhaust timing (which is very desireable on Freestyle spec cylinders). . . . . . .Many 62T cylinder owners decide to "match" the steel sleeves to the aluminum casting at the exhaust port roof ... DO NOT DO THIS ... the result is an exhaust port timing that will yield very poor bottom end power (unless you run compression ratios into the race-gas zone).
Hope that helps.

Respectfully, Harry Klemm



Does that same advice apply to a 61x cylinder regarding not matching the aluminum cylinder to the sleeve port height?

What about matching the width of the aluminum casting to the sleeve on each of the ports?

I just purchased a stock 61x cylinder to replace a stock 62T Raider cylinder I have been running in my Superjet, in hopes of finding some more smooth bottom end power for recreational freestyle.

I just want to do a basic cleanup on it for now if it will help, but want to make sure I don't hurt the bottom end performance, and be conservative with it in case I want to send it in to a builder later for a full port job. The last thing I want to do is hurt bottom end. . .
__________________
Some good answers to some God questions: Tim Keller
My lake: Satellite


Last edited by Midlake Crisis; 11-30-2009 at 05:08 PM.
Midlake Crisis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-30-2009, 06:15 PM   #2
PWCToday.com Is My Home Away From Home
 
Matt_E's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Blowing up Motors
Posts: 14,580
Re: Port matching 61x cylinders

It's worth noting that Harry was talking about the exhaust ports (where 62T sleeves have an overhang over the casting), whereas you're talking about the transfer and boost ports, where the sleeve windows are HIGHER than the casting windows.
__________________
If I sound like a moron, it's only because I haven't typed enough words yet.

Jetworks....Blowsion....Superfreak!....Thrust Innovations
Matt_E is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-30-2009, 06:46 PM   #3
Top Dog
 
Midlake Crisis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Bakersfield, California
Age: 45
Posts: 1,284
Re: Port matching 61x cylinders

Quote:
Originally Posted by Matt_E View Post
It's worth noting that Harry was talking about the exhaust ports (where 62T sleeves have an overhang over the casting), whereas you're talking about the transfer and boost ports, where the sleeve windows are HIGHER than the casting windows.
Good point. I am about to have this 61x cylinder cleaned up and (as you know!) nobody seems to have a definitive answer. It has really surprised me that with all of the collective knowledge and all the porting threads on the two major forums that nobody seems to really know for sure the answer to what seems like such a simple question.
__________________
Some good answers to some God questions: Tim Keller
My lake: Satellite

Midlake Crisis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-30-2009, 09:46 PM   #4
Top Dog
 
sah255's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Mechanicsburg, PA
Age: 33
Posts: 1,214
Re: Port matching 61x cylinders

Quote:
Originally Posted by Midlake Crisis View Post
Good point. I am about to have this 61x cylinder cleaned up and (as you know!) nobody seems to have a definitive answer. It has really surprised me that with all of the collective knowledge and all the porting threads on the two major forums that nobody seems to really know for sure the answer to what seems like such a simple question.
I'm pretty sure its been noted several times - the average home hacker can clean up the sides of the transfer ports but touch the tops at your own risk. By matching the top portion of the casting to the sleeve on the transfers, you'll be changing the roof angle and the timing. The question is: why is there such a bad mismatch? Is the casting height correct or sleeve height correct?
__________________
2010 Rickter
2006 Superjet
sah255 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-30-2009, 10:19 PM   #5
Top Dog
 
Midlake Crisis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Bakersfield, California
Age: 45
Posts: 1,284
Re: Port matching 61x cylinders

Sure would like to hear from a professional on this one . . .
__________________
Some good answers to some God questions: Tim Keller
My lake: Satellite

Midlake Crisis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-20-2010, 09:07 PM   #6
I dream skis
 
chriselmore_1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: san jose ca
Age: 27
Posts: 737
Re: Port matching 61x cylinders

bump
chriselmore_1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-20-2010, 09:17 PM   #7
Boris asked to be MU'd...literally
PWCToday.com Is My Home Away From Home
 
Boris's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Floriduh
Posts: 3,002
Re: Port matching 61x cylinders

To the OP.
If you are planing to have motor work done by a professional down the line, why hack on it now ?

Matching the ports if done incorrectly can do way more harm than good. Ports aren't just holes in the sleeves.
Boris is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-20-2010, 11:54 PM   #8
I dream skis
 
chriselmore_1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: san jose ca
Age: 27
Posts: 737
Re: Port matching 61x cylinders

what about that little tab that hangs into the exhaust ports on the top and bottom? what if you grind that flush w the port?
chriselmore_1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2010, 12:09 AM   #9
Top Dog
 
Midlake Crisis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Bakersfield, California
Age: 45
Posts: 1,284
Re: Port matching 61x cylinders

Quote:
Originally Posted by Boris View Post
To the OP.
If you are planing to have motor work done by a professional down the line, why hack on it now ?
Probably the smartest answer so far.
My cylinder is at Jetworks as we speak.
__________________
Some good answers to some God questions: Tim Keller
My lake: Satellite

Midlake Crisis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2010, 12:14 AM   #10
Boris asked to be MU'd...literally
PWCToday.com Is My Home Away From Home
 
Boris's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Floriduh
Posts: 3,002
Re: Port matching 61x cylinders

Quote:
Originally Posted by chriselmore_1 View Post
what about that little tab that hangs into the exhaust ports on the top and bottom? what if you grind that flush w the port?

If you don't know what those overhangs do and what they are for, leave them alone.
Do some searching and reading on what the ports do and how they work before you ruin a good cylinder.

Not knocking you but I have 4 otherwise perfect cylinders that were "cleaned and port matched" by various people which are now only good for boat anchors.
Boris is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


 
 
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:26 AM.

Copyright 2008 PWC Today. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.1
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0
All Material Copyright 2009 Watercraft Superstore