pxctoday

Welcome to the PWCToday forums, the world's largest PWC forum. Sea-Doo forums, Yamaha forums, Kawasaki forums, Polaris forums, Honda forums, Hydrospace forums, jet-boats forums are all included in this jetski message board, provided by SBT! This jet-ski message board is intended to provide everyone with a courteous, friendly place to find answers, meet new people, improve your riding skills and your ride!

You are currently viewing our sea-doo forums / Yamaha forums / Kawasaki forums / Polaris forums / Honda forums / hydrospace forums as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions, articles and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload your own photos and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact support.

Go Back   PWCToday > PWC Industry Leaders > Harry Klemm - GroupK

Harry Klemm - GroupK PWC advice, by Harry Klemm, Owner of GroupK, a professional aftermarket high performance Jetski shop

Find OEM Parts
wallpapers
Online Users: 403
131 members and 272 guests
Most users ever online was 2,610, 05-30-2008 at 12:18 AM.
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-17-2009, 05:14 AM   #1
PWCToday Regular
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: ITALY
Age: 46
Posts: 132
GroupK 850 SXR Big Bore kit question.

Hi Harry,
I have read with great attention your article abuot the BB kit for the Kawasaki SXR 800 that uses the OEM "stub" pipe.
My question is about the problem of engine vibrations associated to the big boring.
Unlike the Sea Doo big twins (880 and 951) that use a counterbalance shaft to cut vibrations the OEM Kawasaki engine is build without it
Attending that you use a very consistent boring (85mm) and conscious that in any case your kit is not a high rpm package I'm asking myself which could be the reliability problems associated to the lack of a balance shaft
Thank you
Michele
blaster801 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-17-2009, 11:22 AM   #2
PWCToday.com Is My Home Away From Home
 
LisaLisa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: So Cal
Posts: 21,359
Re: GroupK 850 SXR Big Bore kit question.

I'm sure Harry will respond shortly, but in the meantime, I just wanted to let you know I've ridden the heck out of a ski with one of his big bore kits and not only does it really rock, but the ski has a couple of hard seasons on it and still rips like there's no tomorrow - with absolutely no problems whatsoever. If I had to do it all over again, I wouldn't have built my SXR to a Limited....I would have gone with Harry's Big Bore. It's pretty awesome.
__________________

Piggyback rides are my preferred mode of transportation

Last edited by LisaLisa; 08-17-2009 at 11:23 AM.
LisaLisa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-17-2009, 01:31 PM   #3
Tech Guru
resident guru
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Fort Mohave, AZ
Age: 57
Posts: 1,121
Re: GroupK 850 SXR Big Bore kit question.

Michele,
We have done "alot" of 849s to date, and we have not encountered any level of vibration that is noticably worse than an 82mm (781cc) motor with the same mods. That said, the high rpm dry-pipe setups do have a wicked vibration at high rpms (7600-7800) ... but that is the case for both 781cc and 849cc SXRs.
We have done many stock piped 849cc Sleepers in-house, and they seem to run very smoothly at all speeds (they normally peak between 6900-7000 rpm).

Respectfully, Harry Klemm


Quote:
Originally Posted by blaster801 View Post
Hi Harry,
I have read with great attention your article abuot the BB kit for the Kawasaki SXR 800 that uses the OEM "stub" pipe.
My question is about the problem of engine vibrations associated to the big boring.
Unlike the Sea Doo big twins (880 and 951) that use a counterbalance shaft to cut vibrations the OEM Kawasaki engine is build without it
Attending that you use a very consistent boring (85mm) and conscious that in any case your kit is not a high rpm package I'm asking myself which could be the reliability problems associated to the lack of a balance shaft
Thank you
Michele
__________________
Unless otherwise stated, responses to all forum posts are based on my personal experiences working within the PWC industry, and developing high performance PWCs since 1987.

www.groupk.com
Group K is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


 
 
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:35 PM.

Copyright 2008 PWC Today. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.1
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0
All Material Copyright 2009 Watercraft Superstore